Langrock – Princeton: Case Study in Retail Darwinism

 

img_7791jpg600

 

  

 

We think of ourselves as a kind of successor store to the legendary Langrock, especially with fall – and the feeling for tweed, and football games in the crisp cool air, and Nassau Street with the huge oaks turning to russet – coming on.  So the question comes to mind: What happened to them, anyway?

They had a larger-than-life, country-spanning reputation for quality and style, even as their take on tailored clothing became more and more anachronistic. They specialized in heavy tweeds and Saxony suits in the Ivy League, three-button sack-coat model. The pant style was ankle-high and narrow at the cuff. They defined themselves as much by what they did not carry as what they did. (Believe it or not, some traditional shops like this are still in business today – albeit in pretty remote locations. Buffalo, New York, comes to mind.) They thought that men who still wanted to dress in that peculiar style that would have nowhere else to go. Even if that were true, it was a shrinking numbers game.

I tried to sell Langrock our new (1971) “West End,” model. Named for the upscale, fashionable end of London, it was a shapely, two-button, darted front jacket. I thought I could convince Allen Frank, the owner, that “updated” traditional was tasteful and right. He wasn’t buying, but with a vengeance. Mr. Frank wasn’t insensitive to my pitch; he was downright insulted. True Natural Shoulder style was his Religion; the three-button, undarted coat style, the flannelly finish, and skinny pants were the sacred icons of the faith. Anyone who proposed a change was the Infidel.

Never!”  He practically shouted. “I could never put that kind of stuff in this store! Never! My customers would be insulted.”  You’d think I’d been proposing human sacrifice. “This store stands for timeless good taste. We have no use for your fads and gimmicks. Our customers know what they want, and they don’t want shape!” It never occurred to him that Ivy League itself was just a longish-lasting fad.

 

I left the store that day and walked around town in a daze, trying to figure out what was going on. Here was a respected, successful shopkeeper telling me that it was his customers who decided what his store carried. As if a single one of them even knew what the hell a dart was. If that was true, what did they need him for? Was I wrong to embrace change, to believe in progress? Looking back, I think Allen Frank had a terrifying premonition that the formula that had worked for Langrock to that point was not going to last. He knew what I knew. But he was saying, without being able to really admit it, that he couldn’t change. He knew what he knew and nothing else. Change threatened him.

The next time I saw him he was standing in a dark corner of the Princeton University store, in the “Langrock Shop.” It had not gone so well. The sign that had been outside his wonderful Nassau Street store was hanging above him on the wall. “This is a lot easier than paying all that rent,” he said. Two years later he was gone altogether; no more than a memory.

 

Let the dead bury the dead, as I always (well, not always) say. But there is a cautionary tale here. Forget about the fact that there was a certain arrogance and snobbishness to the way Langrock treated the customer; forget about the fact that they let some ideological bias take the place of creative merchandising; forget even that they ignored the Darwinian nature of retail. Remember this: good taste and good style are fluid. Doctrinaire, stubborn attachment to one type of style is to attempt to deny human nature. At least one Princeton gentleman, unable to find anything like anything new at Langrock, found his way to 45th and Madison, into the waiting arms of Paul Stuart.

 

FYI  A dart is a seam that makes shape in a garment. Rather than joining two separate pieces, the dart, in the case of the tailored jacket, allows the front to be gathered together and then sewn so that the waist line can conform to the natural lines of the waist.

What’d I Say?

Hilton-The-Dandy

 

 

 

 

 

Have you ever read an old interview that you’ve given or something that you’ve had published somewhere and felt, like, uck; “What was I talking about?” I have. No fun.

So all the more satisfying to be doing some research for a blog piece I’m working on and come across an interview that appeared on a Finnish site called Keikari.com a year or two ago. I think the most satisfying thing about it, besides not sounding like a complete Bozo to myself, was that I still believe what I said. It means I’m getting down to the core of myself, somehow, getting rid of the chameleon skin that changed to meet the next reporter, or fit in with the next big thing, or trend, or whatever. Not that it’s Voltaire or Mark Twain, but it’s really me, and that’s kind of reassuring somehow. Take this quote:  

NH: Only the authentic thing, the original, will do. NO BULLSHIT. Ever. That is the essence of classic style: it’s the real thing. Fashion, as I understand it, is new for newness’ sake, pushing the envelope, like modern in the artistic sense, great for hanging on walls maybe; but clothing should not call attention to the wearer. That’s indicative of character traits that are just, well, not on. Ostentation, excess pride, lack of solidity. What does the clothing say about the wearer? Not to say trends are bad; things change. But good style adapts the trend into itself and moves the individual along a continuum. Skirts for men, for example, are exciting fashion, but bad style. 

Maybe I’d leave out the expletive next time, but mostly I’d say the same thing today. And then there was this exchange: 

VR: What’s your definition of style?

NH: That which gives the wearer an air of confident, dignified grace. Style is the personal definition of the individual; it is the refinement of the person, the definition of his or her character. Clothing does not have style; people do.

Yes!

The most painful alienation a person can suffer is alienation from himself. I know; I’ve been there. So to read something I’ve said that I think “That’s pretty much exactly what I think!” is kind of exciting. You who’ve never had a moment of neurotic self-criticism may not recognize this, and so God has blessed you. For those of us who come to it later, though, it’s sweeeeet. 

If you’re interested enough to have read this far, you might want to turn to the interview itself: http://www.keikari.com/english/interview-with-nick-hilton/

The Trophy Jacket

jacket
Spring Essentials

I always like to start my spring shopping with one “go to” essential like this lightweight, black crepe jacket from Moschino cheap and chic. This designer’s deft, almost whimsical touch is evident in the white piping and the big pearl button. Reminiscent of the iconic Coco Chanel, this jacket is both versatile and chic. Wear it with a pant or over a dress for a professional and polished look, or with skinny leather pants or printed jeans and a soft blouse left untucked for a more updated statement. Both looks are great! With this one essential piece to your wardrobe, you will get great mileage for many seasons to come. 
 

Weekly Wardrobe Tip

Trouser bottoms

 

Hardly a day goes by that we’re not asked, “What should I do? Cuffs or plain bottoms?”

We kind of think that a man can choose these details himself, based on his own personal preferences and tastes. But when someone asks, we have to answer; and when we answer, we want our answer to be helpful, well thought-out, and practical. We do not know who made up the pseudo-rule that says “Cuffs With Pleats, Plain Bottoms With Plain Fronts,” but like so many old saws we hear in the retail world, it’s just stupid. What relationship is there between pleats and cuffs? Why the rule is relevant today, when pleats are going the way of the 4-inch lapel is anybody’s guess.

So we answer with a question: “Will you be wearing these trousers with a sport jacket or a blazer?” That is, are they meant for dress-wear, or for more casual occasions? If they are meant to be part of a tailored outfit, we think they should look tailored, with cuffed bottoms. If they are for more casual occasions, and never to be worn with blazers and so on, then go cuffless by all means.

Or (and here’s the real news) decide for yourself. Sometimes the fabric, the cut, the color, or simply the mood you happen to be in can determine it. Just remember that cuffs are a more traditional touch, and make up your own mind.

For a good overview of this subject, you might want to visit a great blog:  http://www.hisstylediary.com/2012/03/29/anatomy-of-the-trousers/  There you’ll find some handy tips and guides like this:

Trouser bottoms